The recent amendment through N.N. 20/2024-Central Tax in FORM GSTR-9, particularly in Part III, Serial Number 8, replacing Serial Number A with “A ITC as per GSTR-2B (table 3 thereof)”, has a significant impact on the process of filing the GSTR-9 Annual Return for taxpayers.

Understanding the Amendment:

• GSTR-2B is a static ITC statement that provides details of Input Tax Credit (ITC) available to the taxpayer. It is auto-populated based on the supplier’s GSTR-1, GSTR-5, and GSTR-6 returns.
• Prior to this amendment, taxpayers referred to ITC as per GSTR-2A in GSTR-9, which was a dynamic form, constantly updated as suppliers filed their returns.
• With the amendment, “A ITC as per GSTR-2B (table 3 thereof)” will now be auto-populated in GSTR-9.

Impact of the Amendment:

1. Use of Static ITC Data from GSTR-2B:

• The Input Tax Credit for Serial Number 8A will now be based on the static data of GSTR-2B (Table 3) instead of the dynamic GSTR-2A.
• GSTR-2B provides a frozen ITC snapshot for the relevant tax period, reducing discrepancies and making it easier to reconcile ITC.

2. Reduction in Errors and Discrepancies:

• GSTR-2A was dynamic, often causing confusion because it was updated continuously as suppliers filed their returns.
• GSTR-2B is static, making the ITC figures more reliable and reducing the chances of mismatches during reconciliation while filing GSTR-9.

3. Simplified Reconciliation:

• Since GSTR-2B is generated on a specific date and does not change, taxpayers will have a clearer and consistent figure to reconcile ITC claimed in GSTR-3B with GSTR-9.
• This simplifies the reconciliation process and helps taxpayers identify discrepancies more easily.

4. Clarity in ITC Claims:

• By auto-populating ITC as per GSTR-2B, the system ensures that only eligible ITC for the tax period is considered. This reduces errors in claiming ineligible ITC and ensures compliance with the GST laws.
• Auto-population also minimizes manual errors in reporting ITC in GSTR-9.

5. Reduction in Disputes with Tax Authorities:

• Since GSTR-2B is a static and auto-generated document, the chance of disputes over mismatches between claimed ITC and reported ITC is reduced.
• Tax authorities are likely to rely on GSTR-2B for verification, making the compliance process smoother.

6. Enhanced Automation and Accuracy:

• The move towards using auto-populated fields from GSTR-2B is part of the government’s efforts to automate and improve accuracy in return filing.
• Taxpayers can expect more such changes aimed at reducing manual intervention in GST return filings.

Challenges to Consider:

• Adjustment for Past Errors: If there were discrepancies between the ITC reported in GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B, adjustments may be needed in annual returns for the relevant financial year.
• Training and Adaptation: Taxpayers and professionals may need to adjust their practices to the use of GSTR-2B data for ITC calculations, especially for the first year of implementation.

Conclusion:

The shift to using GSTR-2B in GSTR-9 is aimed at improving the accuracy and ease of ITC reconciliation for taxpayers. This amendment reduces reliance on the dynamic GSTR-2A and enhances the reliability of data by using a static ITC statement. It ultimately simplifies the process of filing the GSTR-9 annual return, reduces the possibility of mismatches, and improves compliance with GST provisions.

Download Notification